https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/issue/feed Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2025-08-02T20:13:52+00:00 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration editors@ccpa-journal.eu Open Journal Systems <p>Croatian and Comparative Public Administration (CCPA) is an international scientific journal specialized for public administration. The main publisher is the Institute of Public Administration and the co-publisher is the Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb. CCPA publishes papers dealing with public administration in its wider sense, with special focus devoted to papers dealing with modern topics relevant for public administration and containing the results of empirical researches as well as the use of appropriate research methodology. The journal is devoted to assure the high quality of the published papers, their comparability to the world best journals in the field of public administration and the full respect of the ethical standards by all the authors and actors involved in the publication process.<br><br>The journal is indexed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) (Clarivate Analytics’), HeinOnline (William S. Hein &amp; Co. Inc., Getzville, New York, USA), Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Public Affairs Information Service – PAIS International (ProQuest), Political Science Complete, Public Administration Abstracts (EBSCO Publishing, Inc., Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), Public Administration Database for Accessing Publications in European Languages – PA@BABEL (European Group for Public Administration – Groupe Européen pour l’Adminiistration publique, Brussels, Belgium), International Political Science Abstracts – Documentation Politique Internationale (Paris, France), Hrčak – Portal znanstvenih časopisa Republike Hrvatske (MZO, Srce &amp; HIDD, Zagreb, Croatia).</p> https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/1148 Foreword 2025-08-02T20:13:49+00:00 Vedran Đulabić vedran.dulabic@pravo.hr 2025-08-02T20:11:12+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/846 The Role of State-owned Enterprises in the European Union 2025-08-02T20:13:49+00:00 Péter Bordás bordas.peter@law.unideb.hu <p>We can witness the appearance of state involvement to different extents and with <br>different goals in each of the economic services of general interest. This new type <br>of intervention is aimed at controlling and limiting traditional market competi<br>tion. Of course, this can not only be traced back to the decision-making powers <br>of the Member States, but it is also the result of the organization and function <br>of EU institutions and their decision-making mechanisms. At the same time, the <br>winners of this are the individual Member States, which creates a basis for the <br>strengthening of national sovereignty in the integration. Member States’ room <br>for manoeuvre has clearly increased in the field of public services, at least in the <br>scope of exceptions to the general competition rules. One of the unique forms of <br>realization of this situation is the increase in the state ownership share and its <br>regulation. A particularly important question from a public financial point of <br>view is how state subsidies received for the provision of public services affect the <br>cross-financing of profitable services. At the same time, this can clearly illustrate <br>the differences arising from market characteristics and the success of liberaliza<br>tion in certain areas. The question of how the role of state-owned enterprises can <br>be determined within the framework of the market economy emerges prominently <br>in the examined EU policies. At the same time, in recent decades, the spectrum <br>of services where state-owned companies appear has been expanding, which <br>sheds new light on their purpose within the framework of a competitive economy. <br>From the point of view of European integration and internal market competition <br>regulation, it is particularly justified to reevaluate this issue and explore the <br>motivations inherent in the regulation.</p> 2025-08-02T13:05:17+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/960 Administrative Judicial Approach to Legal Building Information Modelling in Italy: Application of an Interdisciplinary Approach 2025-08-02T20:13:50+00:00 Denard Veshi denard.veshi@unicampania.it Enkelejda Koka enkelejda.koka@fdut.edu.al Carlo Venditti carlo.venditti@unicampania.it Raffaele Picaro raffaele.picaro@unicampania.it Juljan Bashmili juljan.bashmili@unicampania.it <p>This paper considers the administrative judicial approach to Building Informa<br>tion Modelling (BIM) in Italy. BIM was chosen as an innovative construction <br>method. In addition, the Italian legal system has been chosen as a model because <br>while the EU law only encourages countries to implement building information <br>electronic modelling tools, the Italian legislator has established their mandatory <br>application. Although Italy is not part of the common law system, recent reforms <br>have underlined the importance of the role of jurisprudence. Thus, the paper <br>includes a case law study. This contribution is innovative not only because it <br>applies a judicial approach to legal BIM, while other scientific papers focus on <br>its physical or legal implementation, but more importantly, it proposes some of <br>the reasons why judges make the mistake of not classifying BIM as a method. <br>Moreover, this contribution informs readers of the public procurements dealing <br>with BIM in Italy. So, in other words, it shows that in Italy, administrative <br>judges have dealt with several public procurements including BIM. The review of <br>the Italian administrative judicial approach to legal BIM has shown two main <br>results. First, although BIM is a new method, the main principles of administra<br>tive law still apply. Second, although BIM is a method, several legal decisions <br>have confused it with other concepts, such as modality, software, system, project, <br>methodology, model, or technology. The absence of correct classification by Ital<br>ian administrative judges might be due to the mistake in the invitation for bids, <br>or due to the fact that the Italian Parliament also needed clarification on the <br>question of method versus methodology.</p> 2025-08-02T19:41:49+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/760 Increasing Governance Innovation Capacity of Local Governments Through Knowledge-Seeking: The Moderating Effect of Transformational Leadership 2025-08-02T20:13:50+00:00 Abdul Kadir Abdulkadir_fisip@uho.ac.id Syamsul Alam syamsulalam330@gmail.com Muhammad Arsyad arsyad1965@gmail.com <p>This study explores the relationship between governance innovation capacity, <br>knowledge-seeking, and transformational leadership in local governments. De<br>spite the importance of innovation in public governance, many local govern<br>ments face challenges due to limited innovation capacity. Using a multisite case <br>study approach, this study analyzes two local governments in Indonesia, involv<br>ing eight agency leaders. The research suggests that transformational leadership <br>can moderate the impact of knowledge-seeking on innovation, fostering prac<br>tices that enhance governance innovation. Findings underscore the crucial role <br>of leadership in promoting knowledge-seeking and fostering innovation within <br>local governments, particularly highlighting the need for leadership continu<br>ity and alignment across all levels of management. However, the innovation <br>capacity observed is limited to individual level, suggesting the need for further <br>research into organizational and network dimensions to support a more holistic <br>approach to innovation. The findings also highlight the need for local govern<br>ments to invest in transformational leadership as a catalyst for innovation. To <br>achieve this, leadership should be promoted not only at the political level but <br>also within agencies, especially among mid-level and operational leaders. Local <br>governments should prioritize leadership development programmes that foster <br>transformational qualities and create mechanisms for the creation, acquisition, <br>and application of knowledge across departments and with external partners. <br>For future research, it is recommended that a framework be developed to explore <br>the influence of transformational leadership, while also considering the role of <br>transactional leadership – which remains dominant in some sites – as well as <br>the organizational structure and inter-agency collaboration in strengthening <br>governance innovation capacity. A qualitative approach could provide deeper <br>insights into how differences in leadership styles impact governance innovation <br>and help capture dynamics not fully addressed by quantitative methods.</p> 2025-08-02T19:46:11+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/962 “Under Pressure”: Permanent Transformation of the Administration of Regional Development in Hungary 2025-08-02T20:13:51+00:00 Lili Boglárka Karácsony karacsony.lily@gmail.com Márton Maróth marothmarci@gmail.com István Hoffman hoffman.istvan@ajk.elte.hu <p>This paper could be interpreted as a problem map, by which the challenges <br>and solutions of the Hungarian regional development administration could be <br>identified. The paper focuses on the institutional, organisational system, and the <br>changes of the regulatory environment of these bodies from the time of the pre-ac<br>cession until 2024 are analysed. This transformation of the administration has <br>a direct impact on sensitive political issues, and this structure was even an object <br>of power games in the Hungarian politics. Therefore, the main factors of the <br>Hungarian administration have been, first of all, the European environment, es<br>pecially the regulations related to the EU budgetary cycles. Secondly, as it could <br>be seen, the changes of the government and even the power struggles within the <br>governments have been a significant factor of the changes of the administrative <br>organisation of the Hungarian regional development system. In the Hungarian <br>regional development administration, a fragmentation at the government level <br>can be seen, where under certain governments different aspects of the regional <br>development were shared sometimes by three-four major actors. This fragmenta<br>tion continued until 2022, when a comprehensive integration was undertaken by <br>merging all issues linked to regional development into one ministry.</p> 2025-08-02T19:57:56+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/882 Bibliometrics Study of Journals in Public Administration 2025-08-02T20:13:51+00:00 Sarika Tomar stomar@jmi.ac.in Shikha Gupta shikhagupta@sscbsdu.ac.in Sakshi Wadhwa wadhwaduomo@gmail.com Samarth Gupta samarth.g25@fms.edu Rishav Raj rishav.21550@sscbs.du.ac.in <p>The significant advance of public administration as a stand-alone discipline <br>with interdisciplinary approach has led to a proliferation of journals catering <br>to the field of public administration. The remarkable growth of the field elicits <br>the need for bibliometric analysis in order to gauge the impact and influence of <br>the journals. There are several popular metrics for measuring the impact of the <br>journals, the impact factor and H-index being the most popular. This paper <br>offers a bibliometric analysis incorporating a wide range of citation metrics to <br>provide readers with a comprehensive view of the top 100 journals, along with <br>an in-depth analysis of the top three journals among them. Therefore, the goal <br>of the paper is to help researchers make informed decisions when opting for a <br>journal to publish their work. First, the paper provides a brief overview of public <br>administration as a field of study, its evolution and recent advancements. The <br>paper then moves to explain citation metrics and the key aspects pertaining to it. <br>The next part which also forms the core of the paper offers a tabular presentation <br>and analysis of the top 100 journals with a range of citation metrics such as <br>impact factor, H-index, SJR, etc. and key social and thematic aspects of the top <br>three among them. The analysis shows that Administrative Science Quarterly is <br>the still the topmost journal with an impact factor of 10.1 and demonstrates the <br>dominance of co-authorship over single authorship across all the journals in the <br>field.</p> 2025-08-02T20:01:39+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/941 Indicators for Measuring the Efficiency of Local Public Services 2025-08-02T20:13:52+00:00 Mihaela Bronić mihaela@ijf.hr Simona Prijaković simona.prijakovic@ijf.hr Branko Stanić branko.stanic@ijf.hr <p>The paper provides a literature review on the output variables and indicators <br>used to assess the efficiency of local public services (ELPS), specifically focusing <br>on the quantity and quality of these services from 1990 to 2024. The output var<br>iable refers to a specific local public service, classified by expenditure functions <br>(e.g., healthcare), while the output indicator measures how the service is quanti<br>fied (e.g., the number of health centers or hospital beds). The review reveals that <br>measuring a particular local public service is complex, with various output indi<br>cators being used. There are no standardized indicators for assessing a specific <br>service, and the selection of indicators depends on the characteristics of a service <br>and available data. The heterogeneity in measurement approaches often results <br>in apparent contradictions and inconsistencies in research findings, particularly <br>in studies exploring the determinants of ELPS. Consequently, future research, <br>especially comparative studies, should carefully consider the choice of output <br>indicators to ensure the credibility of efficiency analyses. Regarding Croatia, it <br>is noted that data availability makes it easier to conduct analyses at the county <br>level rather than for municipalities or cities. A thorough analysis of available <br>data at the appropriate level is essential. However, readily accessible and up-to<br>date local data, such as population, area, and financial reports from local units <br>or companies, can be useful for determining output indicators. Previous research <br>in Croatia has focused on the overall efficiency of public service provision at the <br>county, city, and municipal levels, rather than on specific services. However, it <br>would be feasible to assess the efficiency of education services for counties and <br>cities, as comprehensive and up-to-date annual data is available through the <br>Školski e-Rudnik system. To measure ELPS effectively, it is recommended to <br>combine multiple output indicators, particularly those that assess both the sup<br>ply and quality of the public services provided.</p> 2025-08-02T20:13:19+00:00 Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration