Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa
<p>Croatian and Comparative Public Administration (CCPA) is an international scientific journal specialized for public administration. The main publisher is the Institute of Public Administration and the co-publisher is the Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb. CCPA publishes papers dealing with public administration in its wider sense, with special focus devoted to papers dealing with modern topics relevant for public administration and containing the results of empirical researches as well as the use of appropriate research methodology. The journal is devoted to assure the high quality of the published papers, their comparability to the world best journals in the field of public administration and the full respect of the ethical standards by all the authors and actors involved in the publication process.<br><br>The journal is indexed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) (Clarivate Analytics’), HeinOnline (William S. Hein & Co. Inc., Getzville, New York, USA), Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Public Affairs Information Service – PAIS International (ProQuest), Political Science Complete, Public Administration Abstracts (EBSCO Publishing, Inc., Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), Public Administration Database for Accessing Publications in European Languages – PA@BABEL (European Group for Public Administration – Groupe Européen pour l’Adminiistration publique, Brussels, Belgium), International Political Science Abstracts – Documentation Politique Internationale (Paris, France), Hrčak – Portal znanstvenih časopisa Republike Hrvatske (MZO, Srce & HIDD, Zagreb, Croatia).</p>Institute for Public Administrationen-USCroatian and Comparative Public Administration1848-0357Foreword
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/1058
Vedran Đulabić
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244555558Croatian Jurisprudence and Repopulation: Parents Educators v. the City of Zagreb
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/954
<p>The practical problem of this study is the adverse impact<br>of the jurisprudence of the Higher Administrative Court<br>(HAC) and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of<br>Croatia (CCRC) on the termination of social benefits for<br>parents educators, i.e., parents rearing several children, by<br>the City of Zagreb. The study identifies the constitutional<br>and/or jus cogens provisions in accord with the postulated<br>values; describes the decisions on parents educators and<br>appraises the decisions as tending towards, against, or past<br>the constitutional and/or jus cogens principles; explains the<br>decisions; forecasts probable future decisions, and proposes<br>alternative decisions that are more in conformity with<br>the constitutional and/or jus cogens principles.</p>Ivan Padjen
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244559583Comparative Analysis of Administrative Liability for Driving While Intoxicated in the Commonwealth of Independent States
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/750
<p>This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of administrative legislation in<br>Kazakhstan and other Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) countries,<br>with a focus on administrative liability, particularly for driving under the influence<br>of alcohol. The study aims to highlight the similarities and differences in<br>the administrative rules of the CIS countries and how these rules have evolved<br>since their common history under Soviet law. The authors use a range of scientific<br>research methods, including comparative analysis, synthesis and deduction,<br>to examine the legal framework for administrative offences in these countries.<br>The research focuses on the differences in the legal treatment of driving under<br>the influence in different CIS countries, comparing sanctions such as fines, administrative<br>detention, and suspension of driving privileges. Kazakhstan’s Administrative<br>Code is singled out for its extensive description of aggravating circumstances<br>and stricter penalties. The paper identifies areas for improvement in<br>Kazakhstan’s administrative legislation, drawing in particular on the practices<br>of Belarus and Armenia in dealing with drunk-driving. The authors argue that<br>modernising Kazakhstan’s administrative law and moving away from Soviet-era<br>provisions is essential to better regulate social relations and maintain road safety.<br>The analysis concludes by advocating a shift towards the incorporation of<br>European administrative law principles to improve the efficiency and fairness<br>of administrative liability frameworks in Kazakhstan and the wider CIS region.</p>Assel KaripovaSamal SerikbekovaGalymzhan AralbekovZhazira TuleugaliyevaAinur Sarsenova
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244585602Engagement with the EU by the Local and Regional Authorities from South east Europe
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/851
<p>This is the first and at present only study on the direct engagement with the EU by the local and regional authorities from Southeast Europe. Its purpose is explaining why and how these authorities engage directly with the EU. This knowledge is crucial to understand the governance of this region which is one of the most important for the future enlargement of the EU and which is key to peace and stability in Europe. The research was conducted through semi-structured interviews of officials from associations of local and regional authorities from Southeast Europe and other relevant actors (Network of Associations of Local Authorities from South-East Europe, Committee of the Regions, EU Commission). This article also innovates multi-level governance theory, traditionally mostly limited to the analysis of sub-national authorities from longstanding EU member states. </p>Jasmina DžinićCarlo Panara
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244603634Razmatranje faktora koji utječu na relevantnost strategija nacionalne sigurnosti i obrane
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/934
<p>A series of risks can render the entire strategy irrelevant, even if the strategic management process has been implemented successfully. This is because each stage in the strategy's life cycle is subject to specific vulnerabilities and distractions. These risks show an increasing trend, especially taking into account the complexity of the environment and the occurrence of "strategic shocks", as a result of the difficulty in realistically anticipating challenges and threats.</p> <p>We analyzed the factors that can negatively affect the "success" of the strategy, including cultural and methodological aspects of the approach to strategy development. The conclusion suggests the need to develop strategies, despite the risks that affect its relevance, but also the necessity of introducing "shock absorbers", which will ensure the flexibility and thus the "survivability" of the strategy</p>Drazen Smiljanic
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244635656The Role of Collaboration in Supporting Community Resilience Programs in Post-Disaster Events
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/688
<p>The impact of collaboration on the community resilience program for residents<br>of Lumajang Regency varies. For the variable “Strengthening local knowledge”,<br>collaboration is preferable since it allows different communities to cooperate in<br>gathering local information from different perspectives. According to our research,<br>if local knowledge is not strengthened through collaboration, it will actually<br>have the reverse effect—that is, it will not have an impact on catastrophe<br>risk reduction. This is due to the community’s still limited and underutilized<br>participation in government programs for monitoring and communicating the<br>catastrophe response. Different findings were made for the community network<br>and relationship variables, where the influence of relationships within the community<br>network on disaster risk reduction is still non-significant, whether directly<br>or indirectly through cooperative mediation. Because LR is preparing for disaster<br>risk management, community relations or engagement with the authorities<br>regarding the necessity of disaster risk management have not yet been involved.<br>The location, interaction, traits, and interests should all be taken into consideration<br>when forming the community. In fact, LR residents have not yet put<br>this into practice. The findings are similarly important when considering how<br>different variables, either directly or through the collaboration variable, influence<br>leadership, governance, and health. Therefore, disaster risk reduction may<br>be impacted directly or indirectly by the presence of emergency response health<br>services, the creation of disaster-resilient villages, and the creation of a profile<br>of disaster-prone locations. But according to the data above, collaboration can<br>actually have a bigger impact on disaster risk reduction.</p>Oscar Radyan Danar
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244657684The COVID-19 Crisis and State Administration Authorities: A Systematic Review of National Regulatory Measures Adopted in Czechia
https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/918
<p>In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, most countries passed new laws. However, even today, the available literature concentrates mainly on restrictive and coercive measures that impact society as a whole. Specifically, it focuses on the impact of legislation during the COVID-19 period on democracy, parliamentarism or governance, or on measures to support the economy or vulnerable groups and the impact on public budgets. It pays less attention to changes expected in public administration by laws adopted during the COVID-19 period. In this paper, we present findings of a systematic review of national laws adopted in Czechia in response to the pandemic. We conducted a systematic review to explore the changes these laws are expected to cause for state administration authorities and present the main findings.</p>Pavel HorákDavid Špaček
Copyright (c) 2025 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration
2025-01-102025-01-10244685708