Croatian and Comparative Public Administration https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa <p>Croatian and Comparative Public Administration (CCPA) is an international scientific journal specialized for public administration. The main publisher is the Institute of Public Administration and the co-publisher is the Faculty of Law, University of Zagreb. CCPA publishes papers dealing with public administration in its wider sense, with special focus devoted to papers dealing with modern topics relevant for public administration and containing the results of empirical researches as well as the use of appropriate research methodology. The journal is devoted to assure the high quality of the published papers, their comparability to the world best journals in the field of public administration and the full respect of the ethical standards by all the authors and actors involved in the publication process.<br><br>The journal is indexed in Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) - Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI) (Clarivate Analytics’), HeinOnline (William S. Hein &amp; Co. Inc., Getzville, New York, USA), Worldwide Political Science Abstracts, Social Services Abstracts, Sociological Abstracts, Public Affairs Information Service – PAIS International (ProQuest), Political Science Complete, Public Administration Abstracts (EBSCO Publishing, Inc., Ipswich, Massachusetts, USA), Public Administration Database for Accessing Publications in European Languages – PA@BABEL (European Group for Public Administration – Groupe Européen pour l’Adminiistration publique, Brussels, Belgium), International Political Science Abstracts – Documentation Politique Internationale (Paris, France), Hrčak – Portal znanstvenih časopisa Republike Hrvatske (MZO, Srce &amp; HIDD, Zagreb, Croatia).</p> Institute for Public Administration en-US Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 1848-0357 Foreword https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/930 Vedran Đulabić Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 5 7 “No Countries for Municipalities?” – Old and New Faces of Centralisation in the Time of Crisis https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/817 <p>It is a “cliché” in the administrative sciences that centralisation tendencies are<br>accelerated by crises. Public service provision and administration have been<br>transformed by the digitalisation and application of ICT. My article will focus<br>mainly on the impact of these changes on regulatory issues. New approaches<br>have evolved: centralisation and concentration have new “faces”, and a soft divergence<br>between different European countries can also be observed. “Soft power”<br>issues, like regulation and standards of public service provision and central<br>financial tools have become new elements of centralisation reforms, and the concentration<br>of local public services and local administration has become a new<br>issue, especially in Northern and Western Europe. Similarly, the “platformisation”<br>of local services can be interpreted as a new form of centralisation: the data<br>required for these activities are centrally managed, and the access to these data<br>is defined by the central governments. A “Northern” and “Southern/Eastern”<br>approach to centralisation can be distinguished. The Northern pattern is based<br>on new forms of centralisation, and the “traditional” forms of centralisation have<br>a more significant influence on the Southern approach (however, new forms of<br>centralisation can be observed as well).</p> István Hoffman Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-04-30 2024-04-30 24 1 9 28 Tax Autonomy of Local Government: A Comparison of Croatia and OECD Countries https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/717 <p>The paper measures the total (two-tier) local tax autonomy (cities/municipalities<br>and counties combined) in Croatia applying the OECD methodology in terms<br>of the definition and scope of taxes and their classification according to taxing<br>power and autonomy. First, it follows the methodology of previous studies for<br>Croatia, which considered only nominal taxes. This results in a relatively small<br>share of autonomous taxes in local tax revenues. The change from a formal<br>recording of taxes to an effective one based on the OECD definition of taxes<br>leads to more than a doubling of local autonomous taxes. However, compared to<br>other OECD unitary countries (countries with only the local level), Croatia still<br>lags significantly behind the OECD average and also behind the average of EU<br>member countries that are also OECD member countries. The weighting of different<br>categories, despite the risk of arbitrariness, and the resulting tax autonomy<br>index show an additional improvement of the Croatian situation. Further calculation<br>of the tax autonomy index and, in particular, the composite indicator<br>of tax autonomy (share of autonomous local taxes in total general government<br>taxes), as well as the composite tax autonomy index (local tax autonomy index<br>divided by total general government taxes), lead to a further improvement of the<br>Croatian position. Although the country is still below the OECD average, it has<br>improved to an almost median position. The indicators suggest that the taxing<br>powers of local governments need to be further strengthened.</p> Robert Matić Helena Blažić Pečarić Maja Grdinić Copyright (c) 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 29 58 A Review of Factors Influencing Strategy Implementation in the Public Sector: A Conceptual Framework https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/629 <p>The aim of this paper is to propose a framework of strategy implementation that<br>could be more relevant to the circumstances prevailing in the public sector. This<br>paper used systematic review method to assess previous literature on factors influencing<br>strategy implementation that have more relevance on public sector and<br>then proceeds to propose a framework of strategy implementation for public sector.<br>Based on the available evidence, a framework of internal and external factors of<br>strategy implementation is developed. The framework includes a recommendation<br>from the gaps addressed beforehand: 1. To link strategy implementation based<br>on public sector concept with internal factors such as centralised, formalised and<br>complexity structure, transformational and transactional leadership, formal and<br>informal communication, and appropriate organisational culture, and 2. To consider<br>the impact of external factors such as political and governmental regulation,<br>resources from the budgeting system and technology infrastructure on the internal<br>factors as moderators. An implication of this is the possibility that both managers<br>and policy implementers in the public sector understand factors that are relevant<br>when implementing a strategy in the public sector. There have been studies on the<br>application of contingency approach in the area of strategy formulation in the<br>public sector, but not in the strategy implementation. Thus, this study is considered<br>as one of the few studies that identify factors that influence strategy implementation<br>based on the requirement of public sector.</p> Afiqah Amin Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 59 89 Nuđenje usluga kao novi koncept pružanja usluga korisnicima inteligentne javne uprave https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/665 <p>The research we conducted shows that users of public administration services are<br>dissatisfied with the level of application of new technologies and advocate the<br>use of service offerings and greater application of new technological solutions. It<br>is evident from the research that the elderly do not want the service offered, and<br>that a higher percentage of women than the male population want to receive the<br>service via mobile phone. In the paper, we proposed only a small part of the procedures<br>that must be implemented in the public administration and that both the<br>implementers and the users of the concept of offering services should adhere to.<br>We proposed the use of a single data warehouse and an appropriate infrastructure<br>that could ensure intelligent public administration. We believe that the next<br>period should be marked by a greater connection between all administrations,<br>administrative organizations and local self-government units (service providers),<br>so that the proposed concept could be fully implemented.</p> Mladen Radivojevic Davor Radivojević Đorđo Vasiljević Bakir Čičak Marija Kvasina Hadžib Salkić Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 91 112 Human Rights and Equality Institutions in Europe: Increasing Efficacy by Finding a Balance between Centralisation and Fragmentation https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/702 <p>National Human Rights Institutions (NHRIs) are state bodies mandated to protect<br>and promote human rights. Their mission is to identify and tackle systemic<br>problems while raising fundamental rights awareness in countries in which they<br>have been established. Human rights institutions at the national level include<br>Ombudsman (some specialising in particularly vulnerable groups), Equality<br>Bodies, National Preventive Mechanisms, National Monitoring Mechanisms,<br>Data Protection Agencies, and more. In this article, we analyse the strengths<br>and weaknesses of both centralised and fragmented systems of human rights<br>institutions. Using examples from several European countries, we particularly<br>examine how the fragmentation of institutions affects their resilience to pressures<br>which can adversely impact the promotion and protection of human rights and<br>equality at the national level. We argue that opting for a certain NHRIs’ system<br>might exert significant influence on the independence and effectiveness of<br>individual institutions, as well as on the overall comprehensiveness of a nation’s<br>human rights infrastructure.</p> Antonija Petričušić Lora Vidović Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 113 146 Korupcija i povjerenje u institucije u Hrvatskoj prije i poslije ulaska u EU https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/669 <p>The paper explores Croatian citizens' attitudes, perceptions of corruption, and trust in institutions before and after Croatia's accession to the EU. The empirical research was conducted by comparing the survey conducted in 2022 with the same questions from the 1999, 2008, 2010, and/or 2017 surveys. The recent survey was replicated after sufficiently long periods to observe changes in public attitudes, perceptions, and behavior in Croatia today and compare them to those before EU membership. The main research question is whether corruption has decreased or increased since Croatia joined the EU. The results point to the EU's weak influence in reducing corruption and strengthening trust in institutions for the newest EU member state that was supposed to meet the rigorous conditions of admission in this segment.</p> <p>Indeed, in Croatia, the perception of corruption increased after joining the EU. The outcomes worsened in all observed dimensions: corruption became the most important problem in Croatia, corruptive behavior of public employees is considered frequent, and the perceived corrupt practices in public institutions as increasing.</p> <p>The most corrupt institutions are the local and central government, political parties, and the judiciary. High perceptions of corruption prevalence follow the public's opinion that reporting corruption is futile and risky. The opinion that corruption is sometimes the only means of achieving the goal is gaining importance, primarily because citizens lack trust in (corrupt) institutions. Citizens have little or no trust in the highest institutions of executive, legislative, and judicial power: the Government, the Parliament, and the judiciary.</p> <p>This empirical survey of citizens' attitudes and perceptions of corruption before and after Croatia's accession to the EU provides insight into the direction and intensity of changes, thus contributing to the scarce literature on the relationship between corruption in member states and the institutional framework of the EU.</p> Jelena Budak Bruno Škrinjarić Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 147 182 Reviewers of the Papers Submitted to the Croatian and Comparative Public Administration in 2022 https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/931 Mihovil Škarica Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 183 187 Reviewers of the Papers Submitted to the Croatian and Comparative Public Administration in 2023 https://ccpa-journal.eu/index.php/ccpa/article/view/932 Mihovil Škarica Copyright (c) 2024 Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 2024-05-01 2024-05-01 24 1 189 192